Southport residents have rejected proposals to extend walking and cycling lanes across new areas of Southport.
Over 4,000 people responded to a consultation run by Sefton Council, which suggested a number of ways of improving ways of travelling without cars between Birkdale and Ainsdale, and from Hesketh Park through Churchtown and up to The Plough roundabout in Crossens.
Measures proposed included introducing new cycling lanes, restricting cars through more ‘quiet streets’, adding more safer crossing points, reducing parking spaces, installing more benches, and more besides.
It follows work that was carried out last year in Southport town centre, after the Covid-19 pandemic struck. This included replacing parking spaces along Hoghton Street with new cycle lanes; banning through traffic from Queens Road; and overturning a cycling ban on Chapel Street, Tulketh Street and Wesley Street.
Phase Two of the proposals, ‘Tranche 2’, called for this route to be extended both north and south to serve a wider area of the town, to the south along Alma Road to Birkdale and York Road and Trafalgar Road to Smedley Hydro and to the north along the A565 to connect Churchtown and Crossens to the town centre.
The initiative saw Sefton Council able to access £590,457 for cycle and pedestrian friendly schemes in Southport and Bootle Work under the Government’s £250million DfT Emergency Active Travel Fund.
The findings of the consultation will be presented to Sefton’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Regeneration and Skills) meeting next Tuesday (9th November).
A report provides the findings of the consultation completed to date. Councillors will be invited to give their comments, as they begin to wrestle with the issue of what to do next.
The responses so far have been resounding.
Most people agree with the need for improvements to be made to make roads safer and more environmentally friendly.
For example, 70.43% Agreed or Strongly Agreed that Sefton should ‘Improve air quality / reduce pollution from vehicles’; 83.46% Agreed or Strongly Agreed that Sefton should ‘- Improve the safety of the roads’.
A series of proposals for individual schemes from Ainsdale to Crossens all met with a negative response. They included:
71.33% were ‘Not Happy’ or ‘Not Very Happy At All’ with proposals to create safe cycling lanes for family cycling through the Park Crescent / Queens Road junction
77.52% were ‘Not Happy’ or ‘Not Very Happy At All’ with proposals to create separate family friendly cycle lanes on both sides of Cambridge Road
79.96% were ‘Not Happy’ or ‘Not Very Happy At All’ with proposals to create more space for people cycling through the Churchtown Lights Junction
75.96% were ‘Not Happy’ or ‘Not Very Happy At All’ with proposals to create ‘quiet streets’ for walking and cycling along York Road in Birkdale
68.60% were ‘Not Happy’ or ‘Not Very Happy At All’ with proposals to create family friendly cycle lanes on each side of the road along Waterloo Road from Greenbank Drive
70.27% were ‘Not Happy’ or ‘Not Very Happy At All’ with proposals to create family friendly cycle lanes on each side of the road along Liverpool Road to Ainsdale Roundabout
While thousands of people gave their views in the consultation, there have been issues.
A total of 1,517 gave their views on ‘Hesketh Park to the Plough’, 1,510 people gave views on ‘Birkdale to Ainsdale’ and 798 responded to ‘Your Roads Your Streets’.
94.44% of responses came from local residents, with 1.85% from local business owners, 1.72% from visitors and 0.2% (three) from community or voluntary organisations.
The age spread of those who responded was also limited.
In his report, Sefton Council Head of Highways and Public Protection Peter Moore said: “The ‘Hesketh Park to the Plough’ consultation asked people to confirm how they felt about the proposals for the various sections of the scheme including plans for family friendly cycle lanes, new crossing points for pedestrians and junction improvements.
“The most popular response to all the questions asked was in the category ‘Not happy at all’.
“The ‘Birkdale to Ainsdale’ consultation asked people to confirm how they felt about the proposals for the various sections of the scheme including plans for quiet streets, family friendly cycle lanes, easier crossing points for pedestrians and junction improvements.
“The most popular response to all the questions asked was in the category ‘Not happy at all’.
“The analysis work also examined the age range and background of the responders. It was noted that the majority of responders (70%) who gave their age were over 50 years of age.
“This highlights the challenge of ensuring that responses to any engagement and consultation capture the views of the full range of age groups within our communities, including younger people.
“The emails and correspondence received were largely negative in response to the proposals. Common concerns included the following;
- Congestion at traffic lights, particularly on Preston New Road.
- The loss of on-street parking for some residents (on the northern section)
- Loss of parking impacting on the businesses.
- The impact of the modal filters on delivery vehicles and refuse collection vans
- Increased journey times for residents in Birkdale.
- Impact of people driving to rugby tournaments and school events having to park further away.
“It should be noted that whilst the schools identified have set up focus groups to discuss the proposals, the pressures of Covid, lockdown and exams have limited the ability of the schools to respond collectively to the consultation exercise.
“Further engagement is planned as part of the School Streets project, which is currently being developed.
“Amongst the responders, a number of people have voiced their desire to improve walking and cycling routes in Southport but have voiced concern about the proposals as presented. One group of residents have identified potential alternative north-south proposals using Fleetwood Road.”
Do you have a story for Stand Up For Southport? Please message Andrew Brown via Facebook here or email me at: mediaandrewbrown@gmail.com
All Well and good talking about making roads easier and safer for the cycalists , something needs to be done at the plough rounderbout IE Trafic Lights / zebra crossing / and speed bumps going down on to water lane. as this has been an ongoing problem for years . Cars Lorries TRactors all put their foot down coming off Marine drive also off the plough rounderbout from other areas, people have to take their Lives in their own hands trying to cross the road from the Water Lane side, the drivers seem to think because Marine drive is a 50mph it is also that on Water Lane.the magority of people on Water Lane are pensioners , have to try and cross this very main road to get to their Doctors or to shop. there is a Lit up s ighn on the opposite side of the road just before the rounderbout telling traffic to slow down this is laugherbull as drivers know you have to slow down when approaching a rounderbout. surly this is on the rong side of the road. surely this should be prioritosi sed before we evenconcider cycle lanes to the plough rounderbout at crossens.we need some kind of slow down sighns on water lane side of the rounderbout. or camer’s.surly with the money from the goverment for the highways in southport something could be done to make our lives safer.
Metal scrap recovery and repurposing Ferrous material recycling opportunities Iron recovery yard center services
Ferrous material scrap valuation, Iron scrap melting, Scrap metal waste reduction
Scrap metal transport Ferrous material growth opportunities Iron repurposing plant
Ferrous material processing technologies, Iron scrap recovery and repurposing, Metal transport services
Scrap metal branding Ferrous material recycling industry collaboration Iron recovery and recycling
Ferrous material assessment, Iron waste yard, Scrap metal traceability