A leading lawyer representing families whose lives were devastated by the Southport tragedy last summer says the statutory inquiry announced today will “provide insights into failings”.
Home Secretary revealed that the inquiry will take place in two parts, chaired by Sir Adrian Fulford .
Broudie Jackson Canter Legal Director Nicola Brook, who specialises in major inquests and inquiries, said:
“Today Yvette Cooper has announced the establishment of the Southport Inquiry saying ‘it will provide insights into any failings that allowed a young man with a previous history of violence, to commit this horrendous attack’.
“Our clients are relieved that the evidence around that fateful day will be analysed as we know that the information currently in the public domain is the tip of the iceberg.
“We therefore fully support the work of the Inquiry in its investigations and will be making applications for core participant status in due course.
“We look forward to working with Sir Adrian Fulford in uncovering what happened not only on that terrible day but also the years before when there were so many missed opportunities to intervene and prevent what happened.”
Nicola shared the Terms of Reference for the independent Southport Inquiry, which will look in detail into the horrific knife attack at The Hart Space in Southport on 29th July 2024.
The tragedy saw three young girls killed and 10 other people injured. Sixteen others survived the attack but now live with the serious emotional consequences.
It is of vital importance that there is a clear understanding of how this was able to happen, and the lessons identified, so that appropriate steps can be taken to minimise the risk of a future tragedy. This statutory inquiry has been established to achieve this.
Phase 1 will examine evidence, including considering the findings of any parallel locally led investigations, to:
- Establish a definitive account of the events leading up to the Southport attack and the attack itself, including an overall timeline of the killer’s history and interactions with various state systems including criminal justice, education, social care and healthcare. The account of the attack will include the facts and circumstances of each individual death to reflect the purposes of section 5(1) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. The inquiry will consider the accounts of all those directly impacted by the attack.
- Review the decision-making and information-sharing by local services and agencies which interacted with the killer prior to the attack to examine whether there were opportunities to manage the risk he posed to the public, making any required recommendations for improvements.
The findings of Phase 1 will inform the Secretary of State for the Home Department’s consideration of the focus of Phase 2 of the inquiry. This is expected to consider the adequacy of multi-agency systems to address the risk posed by young people whose fixation or obsession with, and desire to commit, acts of extreme violence presents a significant risk to public safety.
The inquiry will examine all evidence as the Chair shall judge appropriate, including, but not limited to, interviews with relevant witnesses and disclosure by the following organisations:
- Merseyside Police
- Lancashire Constabulary
- Counter-Terrorism Policing
- Lancashire County Council
- Lancashire and South Cumbria Integrated Care Board
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Department for Education
- Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
- Home Office
- Ministry of Justice
- Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
- MI5
- NHS England
- Youth Justice Board
- Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust
The inquiry will receive such oral and written evidence, as the Inquiry Chair shall judge appropriate and follow such procedures as are appropriate to ensure that the inquiry is effective.
The inquiry should aim to provide a final report on Phase 1 to the Secretary of State for the Home Department by the end of 2025 or early 2026, subject to reasonable progress on matters outside the inquiry’s control.
The inquiry should make pragmatic choices as to its methods and procedure to deliver within this timeframe.
The report may include recommendations for local and national authorities to address any issues arising from this work. In making recommendations, the inquiry should engage with relevant practitioners to ensure they are practicable.
Do you have a story for Stand Up For Southport? Do you need advertising, PR or media support? Please message Andrew Brown via Facebook here or email me at: mediaandrewbrownn@gmail.com
